TMCnet News

Fitch Rates California Statewide Comm Dev Auth $40MM Rev Bonds, Series 2016 'AA'; Outlook Stable
[September 28, 2016]

Fitch Rates California Statewide Comm Dev Auth $40MM Rev Bonds, Series 2016 'AA'; Outlook Stable


Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'AA' rating to the following California Statewide Community Development Authority (CSCDA) bonds:

--Approximately $40 million revenue bonds, series 2016 (Monterey County GO SAVERs bond program).

The bonds are expected to price via negotiation in mid-October. Proceeds will be used to purchase five series of general obligation (GO) refunding bonds issued by: Alisal Union School District (Alisal), Chualar Union Elementary School District (Chualar), Mission Union Elementary School District (Mission), Salinas Union High School District (Salinas) and Santa Rita Union School District (Santa Rita, and collectively the local districts). The local districts' GO bonds are all refunding bonds being issued to refund outstanding GO bonds on a current basis for debt service savings.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The 2016 GO revenue bonds are payable from debt service payments made by the local districts on the purchased local district refunding GO bonds on a several, but not joint basis.

The local districts' unlimited tax GO (ULTGO) bonds are secured by unlimited ad valorem taxes levied in each district.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

WEAKEST LINK ANALYSIS: Payment of debt service on the GO revenue bonds is a several but not joint obligation of the local districts. As a result, the rating is based on Fitch's assessment of the weakest of the five school districts' ULTGO bond credits: Chualar and Mission.

SPECIAL REVENUE ANALYSIS: The 'AA' rating on the revenue bonds is based on Fitch's assessment of the weakest of the local districts' ULTGO pledges (Chualar and Mission) which in turn is based on a dedicated tax analysis without regard to the local districts' financial operations. Fitch has been provided with legal opinions for each district that provide a reasonable basis for concluding that the tax revenues levied to repay the bonds would be considered 'pledged special revenues' in the event of a district bankruptcy.

CONCENTRATED, STABLE AGRICULTURAL TAX BASE; LOW DEBT, TAX RATE: The economic resource bases supporting both Chualar and Mission's GOs are highly concentrated in their top 10 taxpayers at 33% and 55%, respectively. All top taxpayers for both are agricultural enterprises. Factors offsetting concentration risk include the high value and diversity of the agriculture, the relatively low tax rates and debt levels, and the positive tax base performance throughout the great recession. The Chualar and Mission assessed valuations (AV) increased each year between fiscal 2007-2017 for a compounded average annual growth rate of 5.2% and 6.1%, respectively.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

MATERIAL CHANGES TO TAX BASE: Economic deterioration resulting in a change in expectations for tax base and economic performance, could negatively affect the rating.

CREDIT PROFILE

Each of the local districts participating in the current transaction is located in the Salinas Valley in northeastern Monterey County. Monterey County's economy continues to show steady gains with a growing housing market and sustained employment growth.

A healthy agricultural industry dominates the county's economy, particularly in the Salinas Valley where the local districts are located. The Salinas Valley is one of the most productive agricultural regions in the world and accounts for most of Monterey County's 2014 gross production value of $4.5 billion. Economic stability is supported by the variety of crops produced as well as the diversity of trade partners. Top crops include leaf lettuce, strawberries, head lettuce, broccoli, nursery, cauliflower, celery, wine grapes, and spinach. Top export trade partners include Canada, Taiwan, Mexico, Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore. Agricultural properties within the local districts share first rights to the Salinas water table, thereby avoiding the water issues that impact other parts of Monterey County.

DEBT SERVICE LEVY VIEWED AS 'SPECIAL REVENUE'

Fitch believes that taxes levied for bond repayment would be considered pledged special revenues under the U.S. bankruptcy code and therefore the lien on pledged revenues would survive and would not be subject to the automatic stay (i.e., payment interruption) in the event any of the local districts were to file for bankruptcy.

Fitch has reviewed and analyzed the legal opinions provided by the districts' counsel and believes they provide a reasonable basis to conclude that these revenues would be treated as pledged special revenues due to certain provisions of the state constitution (primarily proposition 13), which limit and direct the use of pledged property tax revenues for bond repayment.

As a result, Fitch analyzes the local districts' bonds as dedicated tax bonds. This analysis focuses on the districts' economy, tax base and debt burden without regard to financial operations because Fitch believes that bondholders are insulated from any operating risk of the district. Fitch typically calculates the ratio of pledged revenues in the most recently completed year to maximum annual debt service for dedicated tax bonds, but this calculation is not meaningful in this case given the unlimited nature of the tax rate pledge on the district's bonds.

WEAKEST LINK ANALYSIS FOCUSES ON (News - Alert) CHUALAR AND MISSION

CHUALAR UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT - GROWING BUT CONCENTRATED TAX BASE

The majority of the district's 66 square miles consists of agricultural properties which account for 72% of the district's AV. The top 10 taxpayers are all agricultural concerns and represent a concentrated 33% of the district's tax base. While the focus on agriculture results in below-average wealth levels for local workers and their households, it did ensure relative AV stability during the recession. The district's tax base grew every year for an aggregate 66% between fiscal years 2007-2017 to almost $487 million. This was primarily due to the rising value of agricultural land. A number of the largest ranches in the district are under multigenerational family ownership.

District tax rates are low and unlikely to rise to a level that would pressure the rating even under relatively severe stress scenarios. Under California's constitution (as established by proposition 13), the general tax rate for all overlapping governmental entities is limited to 1% of AV. The debt service tax rate (which varies automatically with debt service and AV changes) was low in fiscal 2016 at just 0.06% of AV for all taxing jurisdictions, of which 0.04% was for the district's debt. Fitch considers it very unlikely that the tax base would suffer losses of a magnitude to meaningfully erode repayment capacity.

MISION UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT - GROWING BUT HIGHLY CONCENTRATED TAX BASE



The vast majority of Mission's 36 square miles is agricultural properties which account for 88% of district AV. The top 10 taxpayers are all agricultural concerns and represent a highly concentrated 55% of the district's tax base. The district's tax base was resilient through the great recession, increasing each year for an aggregate increase of 81% between fiscal 2007-2017 to $158 million.

Tax rates are very low and unlikely to rise to a level that would pressure the rating even under relatively severe stress scenarios. Under California's constitution (as established by proposition 13), the general tax rate for all overlapping governmental entities is limited to 1% of AV. The debt service tax rate (which varies automatically with debt service and AV changes) was low in fiscal 2016 at just 0.05% of AV for all taxing jurisdictions, of which 0.02% was for the district's debt. Fitch considers it very unlikely that the tax base would suffer losses of a magnitude to meaningfully erode repayment capacity.


ALISAL UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT - DIVERSE TAX BASE; LOW DEBT

The majority of the AV in the district's 65 square miles is composed of single family residential properties with multifamily, commercial and agricultural properties represented in the diverse top 10 taxpayers which make up 5.4% of the total tax base. The regional focus on agriculture results in below-average wealth levels for local workers and their households and the AV experienced moderate declines during the recession due to the large number of single family residential properties in the district. Following declines in fiscal 2009-2012, the district's tax base resumed growing by a solid 26% through fiscal 2016 though it remains below the fiscal 2008 peak. This volatility was primarily due to the housing market correction in Salinas.

SALINAS HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - DIVERSE TAX BASE; LOW DEBT

The majority of the AV in the district's 259 square miles is comprised of single family residential properties with food processing, commercial and warehousing businesses represented in the diverse top 10 taxpayers (5.2% of the total tax base). The regional focus on agriculture results in below-average wealth levels for local workers and their households and the AV experienced moderate declines during the recession due to the large number of single family residential properties in the district. Following declines in fiscal 2009-2011, the district's tax base resumed growing by a solid 18% through fiscal 2016 and has returned to its previous fiscal 2008 peak. This volatility was primarily due to the housing market correction in Salinas.

SANTA RITA SCHOOL DISTRICT - DIVERSE TAX BASE; LOW DEBT

The majority of the AV in the district's 38 square miles is composed of single family residential properties with multifamily, retail, and a mining company represented in the moderately concentrated top 10 taxpayers (16.5% of total tax base). The regional focus on agriculture results in below-average wealth levels for local workers and their households and the AV experienced moderate declines during the recession due to the large number of single family residential properties in the district. Following declines in fiscal 2009-2012, the district's tax base resumed growing by a solid 19% through fiscal 2016. This volatility was primarily due to the housing market correction in Salinas.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'.

Applicable Criteria

U.S. Tax-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Apr 2016)

https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/879478

Additional Disclosures

Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form

https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1012326

Solicitation Status

https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1012326

Endorsement Policy

https://www.fitchratings.com/jsp/creditdesk/PolicyRegulation.faces?context=2&detail=31

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright (c) 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.


[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]